Guide for commissioners on end of life care for adults
This is an extract from the commissioning guide. The complete commissioning guide is available at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cmg42
5 Service specification for end of life care for adults
Commissioners should collaborate with clinicians, local stakeholders, and service users, when determining what is needed from services for people with end of life care needs. The end of life care pathway should be person -centred and integrated with other elements of clinical care.
Commissioners may wish to consider commissioning end of life care in different ways, and mixed models of provision are likely to be appropriate in a local area. Commissioners may wish to take action to stimulate the local market if shortages of providers are identified at any point in the pathway and should note that any qualified provider may include health services, local authorities, other statutory partners, private or third sectors.
Commissioners should ensure that providers implement the recommendations stipulated in the 'End of life care strategy' and that providers are taking steps to achieve the standards set out in the NICE quality standard 'End of life care for adults'.
Commissioners should ensure the services they commission represent value for money and offer the best possible outcomes for their service users. Commissioners should refer to the NICE quality standard 'End of life care for adults' when commissioning services and should include quality statements and measures in the service specification element of the standard contract if appropriate. If poor performance is identified, commissioners can discuss the level of performance with their providers and address any issues and concerns before introducing more formal contractual remedies.
Commissioners may choose to use quality standards to ensure that high-quality care is being commissioned through the contracting process, to establish key performance indicators as part of a tendering process and/or to add incentives to provider performance by using the indicators in association with incentive payments such as CQUIN.
Commissioners should ensure that they consider both the clinical and cost effectiveness of the service, and any related services, and take into account clinicians' and service users' and carers' views and those of other stakeholders when making commissioning decisions.
Table 7 includes considerations for commissioners when developing a contract specification for End of life care for adults. Commissioners may find it helpful to refer to the example service specifications provided on the National End of Life Care Programme website.
Table 7 Considerations for contract specification
|
Heading |
Subheading |
Considerations |
|
Purpose |
Policy context |
|
|
Local strategic context |
||
|
Aims and objectives of service |
|
|
|
Service scope |
Define service user groups |
|
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
|
|
Geographical population |
|
|
|
Service description / care package |
|
|
|
Service delivery |
Location |
|
|
Days/hours |
|
|
|
Referral processes |
|
|
|
Response times |
|
|
|
Care pathways |
|
|
|
Discharge Processes |
|
|
|
Staffing |
|
|
|
Information sharing |
|
|
|
Quality assurance and clinical governance |
|
|
|
Quality indicators |
|
|
|
Performance monitoring |
|
|
|
Equality |
|
|
|
Staff training and competency |
|
|
|
Audit and surveys |
|
|
|
Staff and patient safety |
|
|
|
Activity Plan |
|
|
|
Cost |
Value for money |
|