Services for people with chronic heart failure
This is an extract from the commissioning guide. The complete commissioning guide is available at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cmg39
5 Service specification for chronic heart failure services
Commissioners should collaborate with clinicians, local stakeholders, and service users when determining what is needed from services for people with chronic heart failure in order to meet local needs. The care pathway should be person/patient-centred and integrated with other elements of care for people with long-term conditions.
Commissioners may wish to consider commissioning services for people with chronic heart failure in a number of different ways, and mixed models of provision are likely to be appropriate within a local area. Commissioners may wish to take action to stimulate the local market if there are identified shortages of providers at any point in the pathway and should note that any qualified providers may include health, local authority, other statutory partners, and private or third sectors.
Commissioners should ensure that providers implement the recommendations stipulated in NICE guidance and that providers are taking steps to achieve the standards set out in NICE quality standards for chronic heart failure and end of life care (under development).
Commissioners should ensure the services they commission represent value for money and offer the best possible outcomes for their service users. Commissioners should refer to the NICE quality standards for chronic heart failure and end of life care when commissioning services and should include quality statements and measures within the service specification element of the standard contract where appropriate. If poor performance is identified, commissioners can discuss the level of performance with their providers and address any issues and concerns before introducing more formal contractual remedies.
Commissioners may choose to use quality standards to ensure that high-quality care is being commissioned through the contracting process, to establish key performance indicators as part of a tendering process and/or to incentivise provider performance by using the indicators in association with incentive payments such as Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN).
Commissioners should ensure that they consider both the clinical and cost effectiveness of the service, and any related services, and take into account clinicians' and individuals' and carers views and those of other stakeholders when making commissioning decisions.
Table 9 includes considerations for commissioners when developing a contract specification for heart failure services.
Table 9 Considerations for contract specification
|
Heading |
Section |
To be described in service specification |
|
Purpose |
Policy context |
|
|
Local strategic context |
||
|
Aims and objectives of service |
|
|
|
Service scope |
Define service user groups |
|
|
Exclusion criteria |
|
|
|
Geographical population |
|
|
|
Service description / care package |
|
|
|
Service delivery |
Location |
|
|
Days/hours |
|
|
|
Referral processes |
|
|
|
Response times |
|
|
|
Care pathways |
|
|
|
Discharge processes |
|
|
|
Staffing |
|
|
|
Information sharing |
|
|
|
Quality assurance and clinical governance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance monitoring |
|
|
|
Equality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity plan |
|
|
|
Cost |
Value for money |
|